Michael P. Fay

Fay was arrested for stealing road signs and vandalizing 18 cars over a ten-day period in September 1993.

Fay pled guilty, but he later claimed that he was advised that such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing road signs.

Although caning is a routine court sentence in Singapore, Fay's sentence garnered controversy and was widely covered in the media in the United States, as it was believed to be the first judicial Corporal Punishment involving an American citizen.

In September 1993, 67 cars were vandalized in various neighborhoods of Singapore.

The damage included spray painting and being pelted with eggs, and at least one had its windshield smashed.

The Singapore police eventually arrested two teenagers who were driving a car similar to one that witnesses had described as being involved in the vandalism.

During questioning, the two gave seven names, all male students from the Singapore American School and ISS International School, whom police tracked down and raided.

They found about 50 stolen items, including a telephone booth and road signs.

Fay was one of these students.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of vandalism, referring to two cars that were spray-painted in a car park in mid-September; two counts of mischief; and one count of keeping 16 stolen items.

Fay later claimed that he had been intimidated and threatened during the police interrogation, and maintained that he had been advised such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing signs.

In 1994, a court in Singapore sentenced an American teenager, Michael Fay, to be lashed six times with a cane for violating the Vandalism Act.

This caused a temporary strain in relations between Singapore and the United States.

The number of cane strokes in Fay's sentence was ultimately reduced from six to four after United States officials requested leniency, and the sentence was carried out on May 5, 1994.

Fay's parents divorced when he was a child.

After living with his father for a time, he was sent to Singapore to live with his mother and stepfather, where he was enrolled in the Singapore American School in Woodlands.

Under the 1966 Vandalism Act, originally passed to curb the spread of political graffiti and which specifically penalized vandalism of government property, Fay was sentenced on March 3, 1994, to four months in jail, a fine of S$3,500 (US$2,230 or £1,450 at the time), and six strokes of the cane.

Another student who pleaded not guilty was sentenced to eight months in prison and 12 strokes of the cane.

Fay's lawyers lost on appeal after arguing that the Vandalism Act provided caning only for indelible forms of graffiti vandalism, and that the damaged cars had been cheaply restored to their original condition.

Following Fay's sentence, the case received coverage by the American, Singaporean and international media.

Some US news outlets launched scathing attacks on Singapore's judicial system for what they considered an "archaic punishment", while others turned the issue into one of Singapore asserting "Asian values" towards "western decadence".

The New York Times, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times ran editorials and op-eds condemning the punishment.

USA Today reported that the caning involved "bits of flesh flying with each stroke."

However, Singapore also found supporters among the foreign media and the US public.

For example, Chicago Tribune columnist Mike Royko reported that he had been sent a large number of letters, nearly all of which supported the punishment.

A Los Angeles Times poll found that Americans were evenly divided (49% approved, 48% disapproved) as to the appropriateness of the punishment, but would have only been 36% in favor had the sentence been handed down inside the US.

The Clinton administration ultimately expressed its objection to Singapore's decision to cane Fay.

The official position of the United States government was that although it recognized Singapore's right to punish Fay within the due process of law, the punishment of caning was "excessive" for a teenager who committed a non-violent crime.

On March 3, the day the sentence was passed, Chargé d'Affaires Ralph Boyce at the United States Embassy in Singapore had also said that the punishment was too severe for the offence.

The embassy claimed that, while the graffiti and physical damage to the cars was not permanent, caning could leave Fay with permanent physical scars.

Bill Clinton, the then-President of the United States, also called Fay's punishment "extreme" and "mistaken", and pressured the Singapore government to grant Fay clemency from caning.

Two dozen United States senators signed a letter to the Singapore government also appealing for clemency.

The Singapore government stood its ground and defended the sentence and the country's right to uphold its own laws.

On March 3, in response to Boyce's comments on Fay's sentence, the Ministry of Home Affairs said that it was Singapore's tough laws that kept the country orderly and relatively crime-free, unlike "in cities like New York City, where even police cars are not spared the acts of vandals".

Various Singaporean ministers also spoke publicly about the case throughout the episode.

In April during a local television program, Lee Kuan Yew, then Senior Minister, said that the US was neither safe nor peaceful because it did not dare to restrain or punish those who did wrong, adding, "If you like it this way, that is your problem. But, that is not the path we choose."

Nevertheless, on May 4 that year, the Singapore government via Ong Teng Cheong, then the country's President, announced that the number of cane strokes would be reduced from six to four out of consideration for President Clinton as it valued the good historical relations between both countries.

The other student's sentence was later also reduced, from 12 strokes to six, after a similar clemency appeal.

Fay was caned on May 5, 1994, at the Queenstown Remand Centre.

Describing the caning day, Fay told Reuters that he did not know the time had come for punishment when he was taken from his cell.